Weight gain, body composition, and metabolic parameters of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy versus standard of care in children and adolescents: an ancillary analysis of the ODYSSEY trial.
Turkova A, White E, et al. • The Lancet. Child & adolescent health • 2026
Over approximately 5 years, indices defining excessive weight gain and central adiposity were similar with dolutegravir and other anchor drugs, and lipid and glycaemia profiles with dolutegravir were reassuring, providing supporting evidence for dolutegravir-based ART as the preferred treatment in children and adolescents.
Key Findings
Results
In the ≥14 kg cohort, dolutegravir-based ART was associated with a small but statistically non-significant increase in weight compared to standard of care at week 240.
Adjusted mean difference (dolutegravir minus standard of care) for weight at week 240 was 1.0 kg (95% CI -0.2 to 2.2; p=0.095).
The weight difference was driven by differences in first-line participants (ODYSSEY-A), where higher increases were also observed in height, waist circumference, and hip circumference.
Median follow-up on randomised allocation was 287 weeks (IQR 240–311) on dolutegravir-based ART and 205 weeks (168–240) on standard of care in the ≥14 kg cohort.
792 children were randomly assigned (392 to dolutegravir and 400 to standard of care); 707 were in the ≥14 kg cohort.
Results
Mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) was significantly greater with dolutegravir than standard of care in the ≥14 kg cohort at week 240.
Adjusted mean difference for MUAC at week 240 was 0.4 cm (95% CI 0.0 to 0.8; p=0.030).
This difference was driven by first-line ART participants.
In the <14 kg cohort, there was a small non-significant difference in MUAC of 0.6 cm (95% CI -0.1 to 1.3; p=0.070).
Results
BMI-for-age Z score, body fat percentage, and cross-sectional waist-to-height ratio were similar on dolutegravir-based ART and standard of care in the ≥14 kg cohort.
Increases in BMI-for-age Z score, body fat percentage, and cross-sectional waist-to-height ratio were similar on dolutegravir-based ART and standard of care.
At enrolment, median BMI-for-age Z score was -0.6 (IQR -1.4 to 0.1); 35 (5%) were overweight and six (1%) were obese.
These findings indicate that indices defining excessive weight gain and central adiposity were similar with dolutegravir and other anchor drugs.
Results
Dolutegravir-based ART was associated with significantly lower total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose compared to standard of care in the ≥14 kg cohort.
Total cholesterol was lower with dolutegravir by -15.3 mg/dL (95% CI -21.0 to -9.5; p<0.0001).
Triglycerides were lower with dolutegravir by -14.4 mg/dL (95% CI -25.2 to -3.6; p=0.0089).
Glucose was lower with dolutegravir by -4.4 mg/dL (95% CI -6.8 to -1.9; p=0.0004).
Standard of care in ODYSSEY-B (second-line ART) consisted predominantly of boosted protease inhibitors (195 [98%] of 200 participants), which are known to adversely affect lipids.
Results
In the <14 kg cohort, changes in weight, weight-for-age, BMI-for-age, and height-for-age Z scores were similar between dolutegravir and standard of care.
Changes in weight, weight-for-age, BMI-for-age, and height-for-age Z scores by 192 weeks were similar on dolutegravir and standard of care.
There was a statistically significant difference in height of -2.5 cm (95% CI -4.5 to -0.5; p=0.016), indicating slightly less height gain with dolutegravir.
Median enrolment age was 1.4 years (IQR 0.6 to 2.0) and median weight was 8.1 kg (5.4–10.0) in this cohort.
85 children were enrolled in the <14 kg cohort; 83 (98%) were Black African.
Median follow-up on randomised allocation was 220 weeks (IQR 208–232) on dolutegravir-based ART and 144 weeks (127–192) on standard of care.
Results
In the <14 kg cohort, no significant differences in lipid biomarkers were observed between dolutegravir and standard of care, but glucose decreased with standard of care and not with dolutegravir.
No significant differences in lipid biomarkers were observed in the <14 kg cohort.
Glucose decreased with standard of care but not with dolutegravir in this cohort.
Standard of care for 32 (74%) of 43 participants in the <14 kg cohort was lopinavir-ritonavir as first-line or second-line treatment.
Methods
There were substantial treatment switches from standard of care to dolutegravir-based ART during extended follow-up, which required statistical adjustment.
Treatment switches were substantial in the standard of care arm during extended follow-up.
Treatment effects were estimated on randomised allocation, accounting for treatment switches through censoring and inverse-probability-of-censoring-weights.
Median follow-up on randomised allocation was shorter in the standard of care arm (205 weeks, IQR 168–240) compared to the dolutegravir arm (287 weeks, IQR 240–311) in the ≥14 kg cohort, reflecting these switches.
Methods
The study population was predominantly Black African children with a median enrolment age of 12.2 years in the ≥14 kg cohort.
In the ≥14 kg cohort, 623 (88%) were Black African, median enrolment age was 12.2 years (IQR 9.1 to 14.9), and median weight was 30.7 kg (IQR 23.4 to 43.0).
345 (49%) were female and 362 (51%) were male in the ≥14 kg cohort.
Enrolled across 29 centres in Germany, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and the UK.
Children were enrolled between Sept 20, 2016, and Aug 26, 2019.
Turkova A, White E, Violari A, Mujuru H, Kekitiinwa A, Lugemwa A, et al.. (2026). Weight gain, body composition, and metabolic parameters of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy versus standard of care in children and adolescents: an ancillary analysis of the ODYSSEY trial.. The Lancet. Child & adolescent health. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00339-6