Sexual Health

What are people saying about DoxyPEP? A topic-based analysis of Reddit discussions.

TL;DR

Online Reddit discussions about DoxyPEP reflect active negotiation of evolving biomedical evidence and personal risk, extend beyond MSM communities, and highlight access to LGBTIQA+-friendly clinicians and telehealth as facilitators while provider knowledge gaps act as barriers.

Key Findings

A large corpus of Reddit posts about DoxyPEP was identified and analyzed using unsupervised topic modeling (BERTopic).

  • 8,139 total posts were identified for topic modelling.
  • 5,296 of those posts were assigned to interpretable topics.
  • Posts were collected from November 2020 to May 2025.
  • An unsupervised text analysis approach (BERTopic) was applied, followed by expert-informed interpretation to refine the thematic structure.

Reddit discussions about DoxyPEP encompassed multiple dominant themes including prevention strategies, sexual practices, antimicrobial resistance, and healthcare access.

  • Topic modeling identified interpretable themes across 5,296 posts.
  • Themes included prevention strategies, sexual practices, antimicrobial resistance, and healthcare access.
  • Expert-informed interpretation was used to refine the thematic structure after initial BERTopic modeling.
  • The discussions reflected 'active negotiation of evolving biomedical evidence and personal risk' rather than simple misinformation.

DoxyPEP discussions on Reddit extended beyond men who have sex with men (MSM) to include heterosexual, polyamorous, and swinger communities.

  • Conversations were found in heterosexual, polyamorous, and swinger community contexts.
  • In these communities, DoxyPEP was discussed 'as part of broader risk management practices.'
  • This finding indicates that public interest in DoxyPEP is not limited to the MSM populations targeted in major clinical trials.
  • The diversity of communities discussing DoxyPEP suggests broader real-world uptake considerations than clinical guidelines may currently reflect.

Access to LGBTIQA+-friendly clinicians and telehealth services were identified as facilitators of DoxyPEP uptake, while provider knowledge gaps acted as barriers.

  • Access to LGBTIQA+-friendly clinicians facilitated uptake of DoxyPEP.
  • Telehealth services were also identified as a facilitator of uptake.
  • Provider knowledge gaps were identified as a barrier to DoxyPEP access and use.
  • These themes emerged organically from community-generated Reddit discourse rather than from structured surveys or clinical data.

Online discussions reflected nuanced engagement with antimicrobial resistance concerns rather than simple misinformation.

  • Antimicrobial resistance was among the dominant themes identified in the topic modeling.
  • Posts reflected 'active negotiation of evolving biomedical evidence and personal risk' rather than straightforward misinformation.
  • The authors note that community discourse provides insight into 'how STI prevention strategies and interventions are interpreted in practice, particularly around risk assessment.'

The authors concluded that clearer clinical guidance and community-level information-sharing could support informed and equitable DoxyPEP implementation.

  • 'Clearer, consistent clinical guidance and information-sharing by community-level organisations may help support informed and equitable DoxyPEP implementation and better sexual health education.'
  • The study highlights the role of online community discourse in shaping real-world uptake of STI prevention strategies.
  • The findings suggest gaps between clinical trial populations and the broader public engaging with DoxyPEP information online.

What This Means

This research suggests that online communities on Reddit are actively discussing doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP) — a strategy where people take an antibiotic after potential exposure to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) like syphilis and chlamydia — in complex and nuanced ways. The researchers used an artificial intelligence-based text analysis tool to analyze over 8,000 Reddit posts made between 2020 and 2025, finding that the conversations covered topics like prevention strategies, sexual practices, concerns about antibiotic resistance, and difficulties accessing healthcare. Importantly, discussions were not limited to gay and bisexual men, who were the primary focus of major clinical trials; heterosexual people, polyamorous individuals, and swingers were also actively discussing DoxyPEP as a tool for managing their sexual health risks. The study also found that people's access to DoxyPEP was shaped by real-world factors: having access to LGBTIQA+-friendly doctors or telehealth services made it easier to get DoxyPEP, while doctors who were unfamiliar with the approach acted as barriers. Rather than finding widespread misinformation, the researchers found that community members were thoughtfully weighing evolving medical evidence and their own personal circumstances — suggesting these communities are engaged and health-literate, even if formal guidance has not always kept pace. This research suggests that public health authorities and healthcare providers could better support DoxyPEP uptake by providing clearer and more consistent clinical guidelines, training more providers on this prevention strategy, and partnering with community organizations to share accurate information. It also highlights that DoxyPEP's real-world audience is broader and more diverse than clinical trial populations, which has implications for how health campaigns and access programs are designed.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Zi-Han Xu, Fa-Bian Y. S. Kong, J. Hocking, C. de Kock, Mike Conway. (2026). What are people saying about DoxyPEP? A topic-based analysis of Reddit discussions.. Sexual Health. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH26178