Leaders' learning goal orientation predicted increases in MH-related self-efficacy following Mental Health Awareness Training, and this relationship was positively moderated by organizational climate of MH openness, but neither learning goal orientation nor moderators affected changes in MH-related knowledge.
Key Findings
Results
Leaders demonstrated increased mental health-related knowledge and self-efficacy following participation in the 3-hour Mental Health Awareness Training (MHAT).
The study used multisource, multiwave data from 83 leaders and their followers (n = 383) from 13 organizations
The training examined was the Mental Health Awareness Training (MHAT; Dimoff et al., 2016), a 3-hour long leader-focused mental health training
Leaders were 'more knowledgeable of and felt more confident to promote mental health in the workplace following MHAT'
The study drew on resource allocation theory to examine factors influencing training-induced changes
Results
Leaders' learning goal orientation (LGO) predicted increases in MH-related self-efficacy but not in MH-related knowledge following MHAT.
LGO was examined as a predictor of training-induced changes in both MH-related knowledge and self-efficacy
LGO significantly predicted changes in MH-related self-efficacy
LGO did not predict changes in MH-related knowledge
The study used a multiwave design to assess pre- to post-training changes
Results
Organizational climate of MH openness positively moderated the relationship between leader LGO and changes in MH-related self-efficacy.
The relationship between LGO and self-efficacy changes was 'positively moderated by organizational climate of MH openness'
Organizational climate of MH openness did not moderate the relationship between LGO and changes in MH-related knowledge
This moderation was tested within the context of resource allocation theory
Results
Leaders' pretraining MH-supportive behaviors did not moderate the relationship between LGO and training-induced changes in either self-efficacy or knowledge.
Pretraining MH-supportive behaviors were examined as a potential moderator of the LGO-outcome relationships
The relationship between LGO and self-efficacy changes 'was not moderated by leaders' pretraining MH-supportive behaviors'
Neither moderator (pretraining MH-supportive behaviors nor organizational climate) had an effect on the relationship between leader LGO and changes in MH-related knowledge
Background
The study applied resource allocation theory as a framework to understand conditions necessary for leader-focused mental health training to be effective.
Resource allocation theory was used to 'explore the factors that influence training-induced changes in leaders' MH-related knowledge and self-efficacy'
The study examined both individual-level factors (LGO, pretraining behaviors) and organizational-level factors (climate of MH openness)
Data were collected from 83 leaders and 383 followers across 13 organizations using a multisource, multiwave design
Hildenbrand K, Topakas A, Dimoff J, Nielsen K, Kelloway K. (2026). What factors shape the effectiveness of a leader-focused mental health training?. Journal of occupational health psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000424