Mental Health

What factors shape the effectiveness of a leader-focused mental health training?

TL;DR

Leaders' learning goal orientation predicted increases in MH-related self-efficacy following Mental Health Awareness Training, and this relationship was positively moderated by organizational climate of MH openness, but neither learning goal orientation nor moderators affected changes in MH-related knowledge.

Key Findings

Leaders demonstrated increased mental health-related knowledge and self-efficacy following participation in the 3-hour Mental Health Awareness Training (MHAT).

  • The study used multisource, multiwave data from 83 leaders and their followers (n = 383) from 13 organizations
  • The training examined was the Mental Health Awareness Training (MHAT; Dimoff et al., 2016), a 3-hour long leader-focused mental health training
  • Leaders were 'more knowledgeable of and felt more confident to promote mental health in the workplace following MHAT'
  • The study drew on resource allocation theory to examine factors influencing training-induced changes

Leaders' learning goal orientation (LGO) predicted increases in MH-related self-efficacy but not in MH-related knowledge following MHAT.

  • LGO was examined as a predictor of training-induced changes in both MH-related knowledge and self-efficacy
  • LGO significantly predicted changes in MH-related self-efficacy
  • LGO did not predict changes in MH-related knowledge
  • The study used a multiwave design to assess pre- to post-training changes

Organizational climate of MH openness positively moderated the relationship between leader LGO and changes in MH-related self-efficacy.

  • The relationship between LGO and self-efficacy changes was 'positively moderated by organizational climate of MH openness'
  • Organizational climate of MH openness did not moderate the relationship between LGO and changes in MH-related knowledge
  • This moderation was tested within the context of resource allocation theory

Leaders' pretraining MH-supportive behaviors did not moderate the relationship between LGO and training-induced changes in either self-efficacy or knowledge.

  • Pretraining MH-supportive behaviors were examined as a potential moderator of the LGO-outcome relationships
  • The relationship between LGO and self-efficacy changes 'was not moderated by leaders' pretraining MH-supportive behaviors'
  • Neither moderator (pretraining MH-supportive behaviors nor organizational climate) had an effect on the relationship between leader LGO and changes in MH-related knowledge

The study applied resource allocation theory as a framework to understand conditions necessary for leader-focused mental health training to be effective.

  • Resource allocation theory was used to 'explore the factors that influence training-induced changes in leaders' MH-related knowledge and self-efficacy'
  • The study examined both individual-level factors (LGO, pretraining behaviors) and organizational-level factors (climate of MH openness)
  • Data were collected from 83 leaders and 383 followers across 13 organizations using a multisource, multiwave design

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Hildenbrand K, Topakas A, Dimoff J, Nielsen K, Kelloway K. (2026). What factors shape the effectiveness of a leader-focused mental health training?. Journal of occupational health psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000424