Where, when, how, and with whom do young university students engage in physical activity? A cluster-derived spectrum of patterns across 16 European universities.
A cluster analysis of 2,165 undergraduates from 16 European universities identified three exploratory profiles of sport and physical activity participation ('Autonomous', 'Networked Supervised', and 'Regularly Supervised'), with space, time and equipment as key profiling variables and differences across institutions.
Key Findings
Results
Cluster analysis of mixed data identified three typologies of student sport and physical activity participation: 'Autonomous', 'Networked Supervised', and 'Regularly Supervised'.
Survey of 2,165 undergraduate students (65.3% female) aged 18-25 years.
Students came from 16 universities in 12 European countries and completed an online questionnaire as part of the HYPEM project.
The profiles range from flexible, self-organized practice to more structured, supervised participation.
Results
Individual and contextual characteristics were associated with the spatial, temporal, social, intensity-related, and equipment-related dimensions of PA participation.
The study used an ecological approach considering interrelated determinants at the individual, social, environmental, and policy levels.
Associations covered where, when, how, and with whom students engaged in PA.
Results
Space, time and equipment were the key variables for profiling students' PA participation.
These variables were the most discriminating in the cluster-derived typology of sport and PA participation.
Results
Differences in PA profiles were observed across participating institutions.
The authors state that contextual factors should be considered when interpreting these exploratory profiles.
Conclusions
The profiles are exploratory and may help generate hypotheses for designing and evaluating university PA opportunities in future prospective and intervention studies.
The authors frame the clusters as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.
The work responds to European policy calls for better monitoring of PA beyond standardized quantity measures.
What This Means
This study surveyed 2,165 undergraduate students aged 18-25 from 16 universities in 12 European countries about where, when, how, and with whom they do sport and physical activity. Young adults are at particular risk of dropping out of physical activity, and the researchers wanted to look beyond how much activity students do to the way they do it.
Using a statistical grouping method, the researchers found three broad patterns: 'Autonomous' students, who do flexible, self-organized activity; 'Networked Supervised' students; and 'Regularly Supervised' students, who take part in more structured, supervised activity. Where students exercise, when they do it, and what equipment they use were the main features separating the groups. Personal characteristics and the university setting were linked to these patterns, and the profiles differed across institutions.
This research suggests that university students take part in physical activity in different ways, so a single type of offering may not suit everyone. The authors describe the findings as exploratory. They may help generate ideas for how universities design and test physical activity opportunities, but they do not show what works to increase activity.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Llena C, Fermon L, Andkjær S, Aulanier A, Berrigan F, Bortoletto N, et al.. (2026). Where, when, how, and with whom do young university students engage in physical activity? A cluster-derived spectrum of patterns across 16 European universities.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360751