Parent-adolescent communication is important in predicting adolescents' mental well-being and supporting positive peer interactions across adolescent development, with within-person cross-lagged effects showing communication with parents predicts mental well-being but not vice versa.
Key Findings
Results
Communication with parents had significant within-person cross-lagged effects on adolescents' mental well-being, but mental well-being did not significantly predict subsequent parent-adolescent communication.
The within-person cross-lagged effects of communication with parents on adolescents' mental well-being were significant
The reverse direction (mental well-being predicting parent-adolescent communication) was not significant
Analysis used a random intercepts cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) to disentangle between-person and within-person effects
Data came from 33,824 Chinese adolescents across three data collection waves
Results
Mental well-being had significant within-person cross-lagged effects on social interactions with peers, but peer interactions did not significantly predict subsequent mental well-being.
The within-person cross-lagged effects of mental well-being on social interactions with friends were significant
The reverse direction (peer social interactions predicting mental well-being) was not significant
This pattern suggests mental well-being precedes peer interaction changes rather than peer interactions driving well-being at the within-person level
Results
Significant correlations were found among the random intercepts of communication with parents, social interactions with peers, and mental well-being, indicating between-person associations.
Random intercepts represent stable between-person differences across the three waves
All three random intercepts (parent communication, peer interactions, mental well-being) were significantly correlated with each other
The RI-CLPM framework was used to separate stable trait-like between-person variance from within-person fluctuations
Results
Age moderated the between-person level associations, with mental well-being and peer interactions showing a U-shaped trend across adolescence.
Local structural equation modeling (LSEM) was used to examine potential age-related moderation
The association between mental well-being and peer interactions followed a U-shaped trend across age
The association between mental well-being and parent-adolescent communication increased linearly across age
Participants ranged from ages 10 to 18 years (Mage = 13.55)
Methods
The study used a large sample of Chinese adolescents across three data collection waves to examine longitudinal relationships among parent communication, peer interactions, and mental well-being.
Sample size was 33,824 Chinese adolescents
Age range was 10 to 18 years with a mean age of 13.55 years
47.43% of participants were female
Three data collection waves were used to enable longitudinal cross-lagged analyses
RI-CLPM was combined with LSEM to examine both temporal dynamics and age moderation
Ding R, Xia A, Pan J, Zhang P, Liu T. (2026). Who plays a more crucial role in adolescent well-being: Interactions with parents or peers? An investigation of adolescents aged 10 to 18 years.. Applied psychology. Health and well-being. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70128