Cardiovascular

[Work intensity-current situation and trends : Cross-sectional data comparison based on the 2012, 2018, and 2024 BIBB/BAuA Employment Surveys].

TL;DR

Work intensity among German employees showed mixed trends from 2012 to 2024, with multitasking increasing overall while deadline/performance pressure and working at the limit of capacity decreased, though women, full-time employees, and those with higher professional requirements remain disproportionately affected.

Key Findings

Women, full-time employees, and employees with higher professional requirements are more affected by work intensity than their counterparts.

  • Work intensity was stratified according to gender, working hours, professional requirements, and occupational activity.
  • Men, part-time employees, and employees with low job requirements showed comparatively lower work intensity.
  • The 2024 BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey examined approximately 18,000 employees.
  • The disparity in work intensity across these groups persisted across the 2012, 2018, and 2024 survey waves.

Multitasking increased overall among German employees between 2012 and 2024.

  • Multitasking was one of three work intensity characteristics used in the analysis.
  • The increase in multitasking was observed at the overall population level across the three survey points (2012, 2018, 2024).
  • However, the paper notes that changes in multitasking do not apply to all employee groups equally.
  • Some groups showed noticeably high and even increasing work intensity, suggesting multitasking trends vary by subgroup.

Deadline or performance pressure and working at the limit of one's capacity decreased overall between 2012 and 2024.

  • These two indicators, along with multitasking, comprised the three work intensity characteristics examined.
  • The decrease was observed at the aggregate level across the 2012, 2018, and 2024 surveys.
  • The authors caution that these overall positive trends do not apply uniformly across all employee groups.
  • Certain employee groups still showed noticeably high and even increasing levels of these work intensity indicators.

There remain specific employee groups with noticeably high and even increasing work intensity despite overall positive trends.

  • The paper explicitly identifies that changes in work intensity characteristics 'do not apply to all employee groups equally.'
  • These groups are identified as requiring intensified efforts in work design and occupational safety.
  • The stratification by gender, working hours, professional requirements, and occupational activity revealed heterogeneity in trends.
  • The authors call for these groups to receive special attention in prevention and work design efforts.

Prolonged high work intensity contributes to the development of cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and depressive disorders.

  • Work intensity is described as 'a key work-related risk factor for employee health.'
  • Work intensity is defined as 'the ratio between the amount of work and the time available.'
  • Its increase since the 1990s is characterized as 'a key feature of the changing nature of work.'
  • The authors argue that work intensity must continue to be kept in mind as a key factor in 'occupational safety, prevention, and work design' due to these health risks.

The 2024 BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey examined the current prevalence of work intensity among approximately 18,000 employees and enabled comparison with 2012 and 2018 data.

  • Three cross-sectional survey waves were compared: 2012, 2018, and 2024.
  • Sample size for the 2024 survey was approximately 18,000 employees.
  • Three work intensity characteristics were used as indicators.
  • Data were stratified by gender, working hours, professional requirements, and occupational activity.

What This Means

This research examined how work intensity — defined as the ratio between workload and available time — has changed among German workers over the past decade, using large-scale survey data collected in 2012, 2018, and 2024 from around 18,000 employees each time. The researchers tracked three specific indicators: multitasking, deadline and performance pressure, and working at the limits of one's capacity. Overall, the news was mixed: multitasking became more common, while deadline pressure and working beyond one's limits became somewhat less prevalent. However, these overall trends masked important differences between groups of workers. This research suggests that not all workers are experiencing the same changes. Women, full-time employees, and those in jobs with higher skill requirements consistently faced greater work intensity than men, part-time workers, or those in lower-skilled roles. More concerning, some specific groups of workers showed work intensity that remained high or even increased over the study period, even as the overall population averages improved. This means that headline-level improvements may obscure ongoing problems for particular segments of the workforce. The findings matter because sustained high work intensity is linked to serious health consequences, including cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal problems, and depression. The authors argue that despite some encouraging overall trends, work intensity must remain a central concern in workplace safety and health prevention efforts, particularly for the groups most affected. Employers, policymakers, and occupational health professionals are urged to intensify efforts to design work in ways that reduce excessive demands on these vulnerable groups.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Andrea Lohmann-Haislah, Katja Schuller, Wibke Leistner. (2026). [Work intensity-current situation and trends : Cross-sectional data comparison based on the 2012, 2018, and 2024 BIBB/BAuA Employment Surveys].. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-026-04291-x